Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of u/zchen/week1/plan


Ignore:
Timestamp:
06/26/16 17:42:05 (9 years ago)
Author:
Zhuo Chen
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/zchen/week1/plan

    v2 v3  
    111. I discovered a mistake in the AGB star model. It is relevant to the optical depth. I will fix it this week.
    22
    3 2. Due to the mistake, the mass loss rate was not correct. I think the mass loss rate is crucial in the formation of circumbinary disk. $10^{-7}M_{\odot}/yr$ is somewhat small. If there could be a $10^{-5}M_{\odot}/yr$ AGB wind, the formation of the circumbinary disk will be much more easier. [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A%26A...589A.130L     
    4 Liljegren et al. (2016)] did a detailed study on AGB wind recently. I will try their model.
     32. Due to the mistake, the mass loss rate was not correct. I think the mass loss rate is crucial in the formation of circumbinary disk. $10^{-7}M_{\odot}/yr$ is somewhat small. If there could be a $10^{-5}M_{\odot}/yr$ AGB wind, the formation of the circumbinary disk will be much more easier. [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A%26A...589A.130L Liljegren et al. (2016)] did a detailed study on AGB wind recently. I will try their model.
    54
    653. I will work with Jonathan to add the self-consistent mass loss calculation in AstroBEAR.