Changes between Version 51 and Version 52 of u/erica/LowResMHDShearFlows

Timestamp:

06/03/14 13:33:05 (11 years ago)

Author:

Erica Kaminski

Comment:

—

u/erica/LowResMHDShearFlows

@@ -25 +25 @@
 
 
-[[Image(shear15axes.png, 35%)]] 
+[[Image(shear15axes.png, 25%)]] 
 
 The interface is tilted about y. This is the Shear 15 case.
@@ -39 +39 @@
 A slice taken through the center of the box, in the x-z plane, shows that in the strong magnetic field case, the interface tends to realign so that it is vertical:
 
-[[Image(xz_plane_rho.gif, 35%)]]
+[[Image(xz_plane_rho.gif, 25%)]]
 
 
@@ -49 +49 @@
 ''''Down the Barrel'''' 
 
-[[Image(down_x_coldens.gif, 50%)]]
+[[Image(down_x_coldens.gif, 25%)]]
 
 '''Down Y'''
 
-[[Image(down_x_coldens.gif, 50%)]]
+[[Image(down_x_coldens.gif, 25%)]]
 
 
 '''Down Z''' 
 
-[[Image(down_z_coldens.gif, 50%)]]
+[[Image(down_z_coldens.gif, 25%)]]
 
 A strong ring effect is present in the strong beta cases that isn't in the weaker B field and hydro case. 
@@ -103 +103 @@
 In column density, the transverse runs (y-field and z-field) are mirror images of each other. This can be seen at once looking down the barrel in x. When looking transversely, orient yourself to the direction of the incoming flow along x, then consider the direction of the field using the coordinate axes at bottom of each column. You will see that the same behavior is seen between the different orientations. That is, the middle box has same behavior as bottom right box, when you consider the relative directions of the field and the colliding flows.
 
-[[Image(diff_fields_compare.gif, 35%)]]
+[[Image(diff_fields_compare.gif, 25%)]]
 
 And here are the 3 different initial conditions for orientation:
@@ -109 +109 @@
 Bx
 
-[[Image(Bx_Init.png,  35%)]]
+[[Image(Bx_Init.png,  25%)]]
 
 By
 
-[[Image(By_Init.png, 35%)]]
+[[Image(By_Init.png, 25%)]]
 
 Bz
 
-[[Image(Bz_Init.png, 35%)]]
+[[Image(Bz_Init.png, 25%)]]
 
 Further, peak densities were similar in the transverse cases and both did not form sinks,