Changes between Version 28 and Version 29 of u/erica/LowResMHDShearFlows

Timestamp:

05/08/14 14:40:13 (12 years ago)

Author:

Erica Kaminski

Comment:

—

u/erica/LowResMHDShearFlows

@@ -1 +1 @@
 = 3D MHD Shear Flows =
 
-Testing the effects of magnetic fields on shear flows.
-
-Here are the runs' parameters:
 
 ||Diameter||40 pc||
@@ -10 +7 @@
 ||Density||1 cm^-3^||
 ||Beta||1, 10, Hydro ||
-||Initial B-field orientation||Uniform in x ||
+||Initial B-field orientation||Uniform in x, y, z ||
 ||!Cells/Jeans Length||64||
 ||Cooling||II curve||
@@ -19 +16 @@
 ||Self-gravity||On||
 
-== Orientation of Collision Interface == 
+
+= Orientation of Collision Interface = 
 
 Plots showing the direction of the tilted interface:
@@ -27 +25 @@
 
 Interface is rotated about y.
+
+= Uniform X-field Case = 
 
 == Evolution of the tilted interface ==
@@ -61 +61 @@
 || Hydro, Shear30 || Frame 146/200, t=1.2 || 3 ||
 || Hydro, Shear60 || No Sinks Form || 0 ||
+
+= X, Y, & Z magnetic field cases =
+
+Was not obvious which field orientation would be best to use for the transverse (i.e. perpendicular to the flow direction) field run, 
+since the shear angle breaks the symmetry of the cylinder. So to compare the difference, here are 3D low runs of the Shear 15, Beta=1 case.
+
+In column density, the transverse runs are mirror images of each other. This can be seen most at once, looking down the barrel in x. When looking transversely, orient yourself to the direction of the incoming flow along x, then consider the direction of the field using the coordinate axes at bottom of each column. You will see that the same behavior is seen (at least in column density) between the different orientations. That is, the middle box has same behavior as bottom right box, when you consider the relative directions of the field and the direction of colliding flows.
+
+Further, 
+
+This seems to suggest, at least when studying column density, one can simulate one transverse field orientation.