| | 16 | |
| | 17 | When |
| | 18 | |
| | 19 | [[latex($\omega^2 < 0$)]] |
| | 20 | |
| | 21 | or |
| | 22 | |
| | 23 | [[latex($4 \pi G \rho_0 > C_s^2 k^2 $)]] |
| | 24 | |
| | 25 | we see that [[latex($\omega$)]] is imaginary. This implies that there is an exponential growth or decay factor multiplying the oscillatory [[latex($e^{i(\vec{k}\cdot \vec{x})}$)]] in the solution for [[latex($\rho_1$)]]. That is, |
| | 26 | |
| | 27 | [[latex($\rho_1 = e^{i(\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x})} e^{-i(^+_- i \omega t)} =$)]] |
| | 28 | |
| | 29 | [[latex($ e^{i(\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x})} e^{^+_- \omega t}$)]] |
| | 30 | |
| | 31 | Taking the real part, we have: |
| | 32 | |
| | 33 | [[latex($\rho_1 = \cos(kx)e^{\omega t}$)]] |
| | 34 | |
| | 35 | Now, we can rewrite [[latex($\omega$)]] into a more intuitive form. |
| | 36 | |
| | 37 | |
| | 38 | |