Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of u/erica/Feedback


Ignore:
Timestamp:
01/17/16 23:52:39 (9 years ago)
Author:
Erica Kaminski
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/erica/Feedback

    v3 v4  
    22
    33Adding a precessing, bipolar, 2-component outflow to the sink particle routine, following [http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/790/2/128/pdf/apj_790_2_128.pdf Federrath, et al. 2014]
    4 ----
    54
    65
     
    1312-Rinse and repeat
    1413
    15 ----
    1614
    17 References: https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/blog/johannjc05052015 and https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/wiki/u/johannjc/scratchpad
     15(References: https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/blog/johannjc05052015 and https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/wiki/u/johannjc/scratchpad)
    1816= Radiative Feedback =
    1917The amount of thermal radiation produced in the grid is a function of temperature. Since sinks are a subgrid model they do not have temperature (we are not sure how big the forming star is, how fast it is growing by contraction, etc., so there isn't an easy way of assigning the sub-grid object a 'temperature'). However, we track the amount of energy that falls onto the sink. We can imagine that as material hits the surface of the star (i.e. as it is accreted by sinks), it contributes to the energy that is re-radiated back into the grid. That is because young stars emit energy through many means: mechanical (e.g. outflows) and various radiation processes. Since we are not modeling stellar evolution on the sub-grid scale we are not following how much energy is being released due to thermonuclear reactions in the core of our invisible star. Instead we can just imagine that as the material hits the surface of the star (i.e. passes through the sink particle) it is slowed and compressed, thereby producing thermal radiation, which we then distribute to the zones surrounding the star.