19 | | = High Resolution x-field Comparison Table = |
20 | | |
21 | | Here is a table for each of of the three column density maps for our 5 production runs. Down-x denotes integration down the barrel of the colliding flows. 'Down-y' and 'down-z' denote integration down those respective axes. The field is initialized to be along x only. |
22 | | |
23 | | One may notice that the boxes are different sizes. This was mainly to avoid back-flow into the x boundaries, which we saw occurred in the higher shear cases. See the following blog posts: |
24 | | |
25 | | * [https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/blog/madams06122014, 'Box Comparisons'] -- Posted: 2014-06-12 14:59 (Updated: 2014-06-12 15:12) |
26 | | * [https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/blog/madams061620141, 'More Box Size Comparisons'] -- Posted: 2014-06-16 16:45 (Updated: 2014-06-16 16:47) |
27 | | * [https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/blog/madams06182014, 'New Box Comparison Plots [1, 200]'] -- Posted: 2014-06-18 12:36 (Updated: 2014-06-18 12:37) |
28 | | * [https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/blog/madams06192014, 'v/c_{s} for hydro shear 60, x = 200, y = z = 64'] -- Posted: 2014-06-19 14:55 (Updated: 2014-06-19 16:18) |
29 | | * [https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/blog/madams06302014, 'Resolution Test for Erica's Grid'] -- Posted: 2014-06-30 15:18 (Updated: 2014-06-30 15:26) |