Changes between Version 88 and Version 89 of u/erica/CFRunStatsHighRes
- Timestamp:
- 09/23/14 22:23:40 (10 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
u/erica/CFRunStatsHighRes
v88 v89 19 19 = High Resolution x-field Comparison Table = 20 20 21 Here is a table for each of of the three column density maps for our 5 production runs (Beta 1 at Shear 60, and thus B10S0, S15, S30 an S60 in short). Column density maps integrate the density during the flows time evolution. For instance, mass-1 illustrates the evolution of the density looking down the barrel of the colliding flows. Considering a standard Cartesian plane, mass-1 would be looking down the x-axis. Thus, mass-2 is a projection down the y-axis and mass-3 is a projection down the z-axis. Both mass-2 and mass-3 illustrate prospectives that are perpendicular to the field, which is oriented with the flow. Therefore mass-1 is perpendicular to the flow. 22 23 One may notice that the boxes are different lengths. See the following blog posts: 21 Here is a table for each of of the three column density maps for our 5 production runs. Down-x denotes integration down the barrel of the colliding flows. 'Down-y' and 'down-z' denote integration down those respective axes. The field is initialized to be along x only. 22 23 One may notice that the boxes are different sizes. This was mainly to avoid back-flow into the x boundaries, which we saw occurred in the higher shear cases. See the following blog posts: 24 24 25 * [https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/blog/madams06122014, 'Box Comparisons'] -- Posted: 2014-06-12 14:59 (Updated: 2014-06-12 15:12) 25 26 * [https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/blog/madams061620141, 'More Box Size Comparisons'] -- Posted: 2014-06-16 16:45 (Updated: 2014-06-16 16:47) … … 30 31 31 32 || || '''Beta 1, Shear 60''' || '''Beta 10, Shear 0''' || '''Beta 10, Shear 15''' || '''Beta 10, Shear 30''' || '''Beta 10, Shear 60''' || 32 || ''' Mass-1''' || [[Image(b1s60cdm10simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10noshearcdm10simple.png, 88%)]] || [[Image(b10s15cdm10simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10s30cdm10simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10s60cdm10simple.png, 100%)]] ||33 || '''down-x''' || [[Image(b1s60cdm10simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10noshearcdm10simple.png, 88%)]] || [[Image(b10s15cdm10simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10s30cdm10simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10s60cdm10simple.png, 100%)]] || 33 34 || movies || [attachment:b1s60cdm1.gif] || [attachment:b10noshearcdm1.gif] || [attachment:b10s15cdm1.gif] || [attachment:b10s30cdm1.gif] || [attachment:b10s60cdm1.gif] || 34 || ''' Mass-2''' || [[Image(b1s60cdm20simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10noshearcdm20simple.png, 88%)]] || [[Image(b10s15cdm20simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10s30cdm20simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10s60cdm20simple.png, 100%)]] ||35 || '''down-y''' || [[Image(b1s60cdm20simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10noshearcdm20simple.png, 88%)]] || [[Image(b10s15cdm20simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10s30cdm20simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10s60cdm20simple.png, 100%)]] || 35 36 || movies || [attachment:b1s60cdm2.gif] || [attachment:b10noshearcdm2.gif] || [attachment:b10s15cdm2.gif] || [attachment:b10s30cdm2.gif] || [attachment:b10s60cdm2.gif] || 36 || ''' Mass-3''' || [[Image(b1s60cdm30simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10noshearcdm30simple.png, 88%)]] || [[Image(b10s15cdm30simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10s30cdm30simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10s60cdm30simple.png, 100%)]] ||37 || '''down-z''' || [[Image(b1s60cdm30simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10noshearcdm30simple.png, 88%)]] || [[Image(b10s15cdm30simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10s30cdm30simple.png, 100%)]] || [[Image(b10s60cdm30simple.png, 100%)]] || 37 38 || movies || [attachment:b1s60cdm3.gif] || [attachment:b10noshearcdm3.gif] || [attachment:b10s15cdm3.gif] || [attachment:b10s30cdm3.gif] || [attachment:b10s60cdm3.gif] || 38 39 … … 41 42 = Sink Formation = 42 43 43 Here we denote the number of sinks per run, as well as the frame they start forming. From this we determine what time in Myr they begin to form. Given a low shear angle and a weak magnetic field, we expect more sinks to form. 44 45 See the following literature: 46 47 * [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611..399K] ''Embedding Lagrangian Sink Particles in Eulerian Grids'' by Krumholz, et al. 48 * [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...713..269F] ''Modeling Collapse and Accretion in Turbulent Gas Clouds: Implementation and Comparison of Sink Particles in AMR and SPH'' by Federrath et al. 44 Here are the number of sinks that form per run and the time they first form. 49 45 50 46 51 47 || || '''Beta 1, Shear 60''' || '''Beta 10, Shear 0''' || '''Beta 10, Shear 15''' || '''Beta 10, Shear 30''' || '''Beta 10, Shear 60''' || 52 || No. sinks by frame 200: || 0 || 3 || 1 || 1 || 0 ||48 || No. sinks by 20 Myr: || 0 || 3 || 1 || 1 || 0 || 53 49 || First sink forms at frame: || N/A || 111 || 181 || 138 || N/A || 54 50 || Time (Myr): || N/A || 18.315 || 29.865 || 22.7 || N/A ||