Changes between Version 71 and Version 72 of u/erica/2DShockedClumpsSNR

Timestamp:

01/31/18 12:56:04 (7 years ago)

Author:

Erica Kaminski

Comment:

—

u/erica/2DShockedClumpsSNR

@@ -76 +76 @@
 [[Image(Last_Frame_Comparison.png, 65%)]]
 
-=== Run 3 - Pulsed case=== 
+=== Run 3 - Pulsed case (supersonic wind only injected at t=0) === 
 
-Supersonic wind only injected at t=0.
+I tried to run this case by removing the call to initialize a wind in the beforestep routine in problem.f90, but this produced identical results to my continuous case. This leads me to believe that the continuous case does not actually need a call to initialize a wind every time step, but rather, initializing the wind in the beginning of the simulation produces an inflow boundary continuously over the course of the simulation.
 
-<To be added... >
+If we want to look at a pulsed case then, we need to turn off the wind after some dt and specify a new boundary condition along the inflow edge. A continuous post-shock wind may be more well-suited for the problem at hand, however, rather than a pulsed inflow boundary condition. Thus, investigating this case further is currently low-priority.
 
 === Run 4 - Mach Comparison (Mach 1.5, 10, 100) ===