Changes between Version 64 and Version 65 of u/erica/2DShockedClumpsSNR

Timestamp:

01/26/18 08:57:30 (7 years ago)

Author:

Erica Kaminski

Comment:

—

u/erica/2DShockedClumpsSNR

@@ -84 +84 @@
 === Run 4 - Mach Comparison (Mach 100 vs. 200 vs. 300) === 
 
-=== Run 5 - Mach Comparison (Mach 1.5, 6, 10) ===
+=== Run 5 - Mach Comparison (Mach 1.5, 10, 100) ===
+
+[[Image(Mach_comparison_earlier.png, 75%)]]
+
+[[Image(Mach_comparison_later.png, 75%)]]
 
 === Run 6 - AMR tests ===
@@ -90 +94 @@
 This set of runs is meant to see how to adequately track the shock front with AMR and the clump. As the resolution in the ambient medium goes down with AMR, we wish to provide adequate resolution around the shock front as to not degrade the solution. Am doing a quick test of an AMR simulation of the fiducial initial conditions with the resolution of the ambient medium decreased by a factor of 4, plus two levels of refinement on the clump and refinement triggered by density gradients. 
 
-Estimate ~ 3 hours per frame with cooling turned on at same resolution above (on 24 processors).
+[[Image(amr_mesh.png, 75%)]]
+
+[[Image(AMR_Fixed_Comparison.png, 75%)]]
 
 === Run 7 - Prelim 3D run ===
 
+[[Image(3D_contour.png, 75%)]]
 
+[[Image(3D_Mesh.png, 75%)]]
+
+Estimate ~ 5 hours per frame with cooling turned on at same resolution above (on 24 processors).
 
 === Unresolved thoughts: ===