Changes between Version 50 and Version 51 of u/erica/2DShockedClumpsSNR

Timestamp:

01/24/18 16:03:32 (7 years ago)

Author:

Erica Kaminski

Comment:

—

u/erica/2DShockedClumpsSNR

@@ -59 +59 @@
 (note time slider is in units of the crushing time)
 
-|| rho (cm^-2^) ||  [attachment:n_cgs.gif​ movie] ||
-|| temp (K) || [attachment:temp_cgs.gif​ movie]  ||
-|| press (Ba) || [attachment:P_cgs.gif​ movie]  ||
+|| n (cm^-2^) ||  [attachment:n_cgs.gif​ movie] ||
+|| T (K) || [attachment:temp_cgs.gif​ movie]  ||
+|| P (Ba) || [attachment:P_cgs.gif​ movie]  ||
 || Mach || [attachment:Mach.gif​ movie]  ||
 || Schleiren || [attachment:Schleiren.gif​ movie]  ||
 
+=== Run 2 - PPM vs. PPL scheme === 
 
-=== Run 2 - Pulsed case=== 
+This run was just to see if the choice of solver produced significantly changes the simulation structures. To check this, here is a line plot of the density vs. density with the PPM method (the previous simulation used the PPL): 
 
-Supersonic wind only injected at t=0 (from lower x-boundary)
+Here is a movie of the density:
+
+|| n (cm^-2^) ||  [attachment:n_cgs_PPM.gif​ movie] ||
+
+=== Run 3 - Pulsed case=== 
+
+Supersonic wind only injected at t=0.
 
 <To be added... >