| 66 | | Focusing on mass loss rate at the moment. Testing on Run5 (Aniso) so I can compare to Jonathan's paper. Created all the expressions I believe are required (see attachment:expressions.xml), with the mass flux defined as density times radial velocity^2^ (properly scaled). When I perform a weighted query on the mass flux over a spherical isosurface (defined in terms of distance from origin), however, I get a value about 3 magnitudes too large (1.14*10^13^). Also tried calculating flux with the mesh flux operator, but velocity times density doesn't seem to be the appropriate quantity. It does make nice pictures, though: |
| | 66 | Focusing on mass loss rate at the moment. Testing on Run5 (Aniso) so I can compare to Jonathan's paper. Created all the expressions I believe are required (see [attachment:expressions.xml attachment]), with the mass flux defined as density times radial velocity^2^ (properly scaled). When I perform a weighted query on the mass flux over a spherical isosurface (defined in terms of distance from origin), however, I get a value about 3 magnitudes too large (1.14*10^13^). Also tried calculating flux with the mesh flux operator, but velocity times density doesn't seem to be the appropriate quantity. It does make nice pictures, though: |
