Changes between Version 18 and Version 19 of ShockedClumps

Timestamp:

05/20/11 15:52:10 (14 years ago)

Author:

Jonathan

Comment:

—

ShockedClumps

@@ +1 @@
+[[PageOutline]]
+
 = Shocked Clumps =
 
@@ -65 +67 @@
 Run E which is also very curious because while neither the bow shock nor the transmitted shock initially is cooling, the intersection of the transmitted shock with the wrap around shock triggers dramatic cooling and fragmentation.  From the intersection of the red line with 800 km/s we see that the transmitted shock is on the same region of the cooling curve as the bow shock was for run F and once it begins to cool the cooling length drops from 10 R,,c,, to .01 R,,c,,.
 
-== Images ==
+== Images and Movies ==
 
 || ||  A 50 10 (bow only)  ||  D 400 10 (clump only)  ||  E 800 10 (neither **)  ||  F 200 100 (both)  ||
@@ -77 +79 @@
 
 
+== Paper Figures ==
+
+=== Zone Plots ===
+Analytic Zone Plot
+
+[[Image(SingleAnalyticSmall.png)]]
+
+Analytic Zone Plot Series
+
+[[Image(AnalyticSeries.png, width=500)]]
+
+Raymond Zone Plot Series with varying clump size
+
+[[Image(RaymondSeries.png, width=500)]]
+
+=== Schlieriens ===
+
+I am currently finishing the 200_100 run and should have the missing frame soon.  I will also run a non-cooling run and try to get a both-cooling run with a chi of 10 so that the differences will be totally due to cooling (not chi)...
+
+Schlieriens of density at three different frames matching the transmitted shock position
+
+[[Image(schlierien_transsync71123.png, width=800)]]
+
+Schlieriens of density at three different frames matching the bow shock position
+
+[[Image(schlierien_bowsync71123.png, width=800)]]
+