Version 18 (modified by 9 years ago) ( diff ) | ,
---|
Defining the parameter space for stellar-planetary wind interactions
Ignoring magnetic fields, and assuming circular orbits, we can define the problem using these 9 primary variables
Mass of planet | |
Radius of planet | |
Temperature at planet surface | |
Density at planet surface | |
Mass of star | |
Radius of star | |
Temperature at stellar surface | |
Density at stellar surface | |
orbital separation |
Time and length symmetry allows us to fix the total mass and separation without loss of generality. In addition, the actual densities don't matter - just their ratios, so we can also fix the planetary density without loss of generality. So we can reduce the list of 9 primary variables to the following six dimensionless variables that define the interaction
mass ratio | |
ratio of densities at surfaces | |
dimensionless planetary radius | |
dimensionless stellar radius | |
characterizes planetary wind | |
characterizes stellar wind |
Now instead of those 6, we may want to define the following 5 length scales, and density ratio at the bow shock
Ratio of Hill radius to orbital radius | |
Ratio of bow shock radius to orbital radius | |
Ratio of planetary radius to orbital radius | |
Ratio of sonic radius of planetary wind to planetary orbital radius | |
Density ratio at bow shock. | |
Ratio of sonic radius of stellar wind to planetary orbital radius |
Using the following relations,
orbital angular velocity | |
Hill radius | |
stellar sound speed | |
planetary sound speed | |
bow shock standoff distance |
and the dimensionless solution to the Parker Wind
which gives us the following solutions for the stellar and planetary winds
We can directly calculate
and numerically solve the following 3 equations for
and , andMatsakos et al, compare the ordering of the Hill radius, the bow radius, and the magnetic radius which give 6 different possible orderings. They lump them into 4 different types.
I | |
II | |
III | |
III | |
IV | |
IV |
In general, the planet radius will always be the smallest. But they ignored the location of the sonic surfaces for both the planet and stellar winds as well as the density contrast at the bow shock - which all might be important for determining the morphology of resulting flows.
Planetary Atmospheres
Profiles
- Density
- Enclosed Mass
- Pressure - and rho*R*T mismatch
Module supports
- Global simulation in a fixed frame
- Global simulation in a rotating frame
- Local simulation in a rotating frame
- Spatial based Refinement of planet
- Stellar envelope in HSE
- Source code problem.f90
- Data file problem.data
- Uses Particles, Ambients, Clumps, and Refinement Objects
Still working on
- Basic testing of hydrostatic equilibrium for planet
- Line transfer for stellar heating
- Second AMR implicit solve may need to be added later (ie Howell and Greenough 2002)
Results
Working on getting stable planetary atmosphere using profile without a core. Turning on characteristic limiting seems to cause numerical artifacts which lead to 'explosion'. See ticket #
Attachments (13)
- Limiter.png (28.1 KB ) - added by 11 years ago.
- Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 9.04.53 AM.png (44.9 KB ) - added by 11 years ago.
- Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 9.06.06 AM.png (140.9 KB ) - added by 11 years ago.
- Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 9.08.08 AM.png (175.4 KB ) - added by 11 years ago.
- Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 10.12.16 AM.png (77.3 KB ) - added by 11 years ago.
- Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 2.33.57 PM.png (43.8 KB ) - added by 11 years ago.
- Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 2.33.42 PM.png (48.8 KB ) - added by 11 years ago.
- Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 10.12.16 AM.2.png (77.3 KB ) - added by 11 years ago.
- problem.f90 (8.4 KB ) - added by 11 years ago.
- problem.data (735 bytes ) - added by 11 years ago.
- calcvars.m (2.7 KB ) - added by 9 years ago.
- mypsi.m (156 bytes ) - added by 9 years ago.
- phi.m (72 bytes ) - added by 9 years ago.
Download all attachments as: .zip